Picture this: a newly formed team gathers in the office for the first time. There's a buzz of excitement, friendly handshakes and polite conversation. Everyone seems to get along, sharing interests in weekend activities, swapping favourite TV and shows and rugby games or cracking a few jokes.
The vibe is good, the chemistry is flowing. But as the weeks progress, cracks begin to show. The team, though cohesive on the surface, starts to struggle with deadlines, disagreements bubble up and the performance lags expectations. What could have gone went wrong?
Welcome to the myth of team chemistry.
For years, team leaders and coaches have bought into the idea that a team needs to be like a group of best friends to perform well. This belief—the notion that if people "click" socially, they’ll naturally produce great work together—is one of the most persistent and romanticised ideas about teamwork. But the reality is far more complex. While social cohesion is nice, it is not a reliable predictor of success. We'll explore why getting along isn't enough and dive into the real, research-backed elements that make teams effective. Spoiler alert: it’s less about weekend barbecues and more about trust, respect, and shared purpose. Let’s break the myth.
The Chemistry Trap: Why “Getting Along” Feels Like It Should Work
It’s easy to fall for the idea that personal chemistry and professional success go hand in hand. After all, in our personal lives, we tend to gravitate toward people we get along with. A harmonious relationship feels like a foundation for everything, right? But the world of teams is different from personal relationships. First, let’s unpack what we mean by “chemistry” in the team context. Chemistry often refers to social bonding—people liking each other, feeling comfortable together and enjoying each other’s company. It’s a form of social glue and it feels intuitively good. But here's the catch: that “feel-good” factor can sometimes be a mask for deeper issues, like avoidance of conflict, groupthink or complacency.
Harmony does not necessarily constitute cohesion where members are hesitant to challenge each other’s ideas because they don’t want to rock the boat. This can lead to unproductive consensus or “groupthink,” where decisions are made for the sake of agreement rather than for the best outcomes.
What Really Drives Team Success: Psychological Safety, Trust, and Shared Goals
So, if getting along isn’t the magic formula, what is? According to research by Amy Edmondson, a Harvard Business School professor who pioneered the concept of psychological safety, the true driver of high-performing teams isn’t whether people like each other, but whether they feel safe with each other.
Psychological safety refers to the sense of confidence among team members that they can express their thoughts, share ideas, and make mistakes without fear of embarrassment or punishment. Amy Edmondson, a professor at Harvard Business School, discovered that teams characterised by high psychological safety tend to perform better than those that value harmony at the cost of suppressing dissent. This happens because psychologically safe environments encourage constructive conflict, leading to improved decision-making and enhanced innovation.
Trust is another critical ingredient. But it’s important to clarify, that trust doesn’t mean personal friendship. It means reliability—the confidence that team members will do what they say, deliver on time and be competent in their work. Trust, in this sense, is about professional respect, not personal affection. You don’t need to love your colleagues; you must trust that they’ll show up and do their part.
Finally, shared vision is the third pillar of effective teams. A team needs a unifying sense of purpose that goes beyond individual interests. When teams rally around a clear, common goal, they are more likely to overcome personal differences and focus on results.
The Pitfalls of Prioritising Friendships Over Performance
When teams are too focused on getting along, they often avoid difficult conversations that could improve performance. For example, consider the scenario of underperformance. In a team that values harmony above all else, people may hesitate to give critical feedback to an underperforming colleague because they fear it will disrupt the social dynamics. Over time, this creates resentment, passive-aggressive behaviour, and poor results.
The “friendship first” mindset also stifles diversity of thought. A team prioritising cohesion over diversity may fall into a homogenous way of thinking, inadvertently side-lining innovative or contrarian ideas that may otherwise lead to breakthroughs. True team success lies in the ability to leverage diverse perspectives—not in everyone thinking alike.
This is where coaches come in. Team coaches can help shift the focus from social comfort to constructive collaboration. By facilitating open communication and challenging teams to engage in productive conflict, coaches can break the cycle of polite agreement and encourage more robust, creative decision-making. This can still be done respectfully.
How to Coach for Trust and Respect, Not Just Harmony
If team chemistry isn’t the answer, what is the role of a coach in fostering the right environment for success? Let’s explore a few strategies that coaches and team leaders can use to build trust, respect, and performance-oriented cultures:
Foster Constructive Conflict Encourage the team to engage in debates and discussions where opposing views are welcomed and even encouraged. Rather than avoiding conflict, teach teams to approach disagreements as opportunities to explore new ideas. Research by Patrick Lencioni in The Five Dysfunctions of a Team demonstrates that fear of conflict is a major barrier to team success. Coaches can help teams reframe conflict as a tool for growth.
Build Psychological Safety Create a team culture where members feel safe to speak up, make mistakes, and offer feedback without fear of retribution. Start by modelling vulnerability as a leader or coach. According to Google's well-known Project Aristotle, psychological safety was the number one predictor of high-performing teams within the company.
Clarify Roles and Expectations Trust isn’t built on friendships alone—it comes from clarity. Coaches can help teams establish clear roles and expectations, ensuring that every member understands their responsibilities and the responsibilities of others. This builds reliability and ensures that the team functions smoothly even when social bonds aren’t strong.
Focus on Shared Goals and Accountability Help the team rally around a common purpose. Coaches should guide teams to establish shared goals and hold each other accountable. When everyone is working toward a shared vision, the need for personal chemistry takes a backseat to achieving results. A study by Gallup found that teams with a clear understanding of their goals and accountability systems are significantly more productive.
Leverage Diversity One of the most powerful assets a team has is the diversity of its members. Coaches should encourage teams to embrace different perspectives rather than trying to homogenise their thinking. Cognitive diversity—differences in the way individuals think and approach problems—has been shown to improve decision-making and innovation.
Why Respect Trumps Liking Each Other
One of the most surprising truths about team dynamics is that mutual respect is often more important than personal friendships. You don’t have to like your teammates to work well with them. Some of the most effective teams are made up of individuals who wouldn’t necessarily choose to hang out after work but hold deep respect for each other’s abilities, perspectives and contributions. Respect goes beyond politeness. It’s about valuing the work and skills that others bring to the table. When teams operate on a foundation of respect, they’re better able to collaborate, challenge each other constructively and ultimately, achieve their goals.
Conclusion: Chemistry Is Overrated—But Team Success Is Within Reach
The myth of team chemistry often lures us into believing that personal bonds are the key to great teamwork. But as we've seen, true team success is built on a foundation of psychological safety, trust, respect, and a shared sense of purpose. While it’s always nice when teams get along, it’s not a prerequisite for high performance. Sometimes the teams that challenge each other—through constructive conflict, accountability, and diversity—achieve the greatest results.
The next time you’re tempted to measure a team’s potential by how well they “click,” remember: the real magic happens when teams learn to respect, trust, and challenge each other in pursuit of something bigger than their individual egos. Friendship is a bonus, but it’s not the prize. The prize is a collective success. Hopefully this article : The Myth of Team Chemistry: Why Getting Along Isn’t Enough for Success will be helpful to your teams' success.
Comments